Right wing Hate Organization disguised as 'students association' targetting university professors

http://www.studentsforacademicfreedom.org/comp/default.asp

At the So Called 'Students for Academic Freedom' site, a reactionary conservative students associations sponsored by reknown racist, David Horowitz, youll find a 'complaints link' section for students who feel that they have had their 'academic freedom' challenged to voice out, in the case that the organization can actively attack these professors in the manner of threats to the university, and potentially physical attacks on the professors themselves (who are named by name on the site, along with department, room number and phone). This kind of 'hit list' effort is no different that the threatening behavior that goes on at such sites as Stormfront.org, and other reactionary right wing sites.

There needs to be more watchdog's for dangerous student groups posing as 'advocates of freedom' in america. Lets not al forget, the Nazi's too started off as a small political party of likeminded individuals who were in the minority opinion of their country. They were not monitored and the people were not warned of their true intents either.

Info the Republican administration couldn't get from Google, it gets by strong-arming ISP's

http://www.informationweek.com/story/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=184401156


According to a new article from InformationWeek, the private information on each of you (your searches, your purchases, your ID, what your looking for and what you think about the government) that the government could not get from the sometimes waffling populist Google, it was already working to get from ISP's directly.

I hope you all are used to or understand how to work with Proxy's because Uncle Dubya and Darth Rove are watching over your back online, with an orange jumpsuit and a paid vacation in Guantanamo Bay waiting for all you dissenters and 'un-americans'.

What the Right Wing hates to hear and loves to spin: Media polls show the MAJORITY of americans support womens right of choice

I apologize for my brief vanishing act. Active world duties need attending.



http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory?id=1715851&page=2

(your going to have to copy and paste the address into your address bar, Im still working on how to create links)
Despite being lead by "the united, not the divider", Americans are just as divided as ever. You could argue that we know this due to what the media stations tell us, but the truth is the polls dont really tell us anything for sure. For example, another "poll' released from the media.
According to this poll, 19 percent of Americans said abortion should be legal in all cases. 16 percent of americans said it should never be legal and 6 percent did not know. When the poll questions were asked differently, 52 percent of the people polled thought abortion should be legal in most or all cases; 43 percent of people said it should be illegal most or all of the time. (ABC News)

What does this poll say? We'll if you are one of those who takes polls at face value and assumes validity and accuracy, well this poll does show that the clear majority of americans support the right to choice. That "clear majority" spell has been a ringtone for the idiots over at FOX news 10 times a day. Just the other day, I noticed on the FOX news product station, a new "FOX poll" stating that 51% of Americans support the port deal (another bag of liver spots). I'll go into this later in another blog, but the point is the right wing loves to tout the numbers...except when the numbers do not agree with them.

If you are, like myself, a person who hold high doubts in private media polls, then the conclusion you'll probably come is that the only thing these polls show is that of the small split portion of the public which these media outlets survey, the majority of these individuals support a womens right to choose. "Then whats your conclusion?" You may be asking?

That it does not matter what portion of the public of the public believes what. When it comes to personal freedoms and individual rights, this country was founded off the principle that the minority has just as much entitlement to freedom that the majority enjoy's, whether or not the majority wishes such freedoms to be entitled to certain to them. this has been the case with everything from ending slavery, to women's sufferage, to votering rights', to homosexuals rights (all of which have been affirmed within the courts and the legislature on the books).
By attacking Roe v Wade so blatantly, SD has set a standard stating whenever the empowered majority of a state does not like a nationally enacted policy which is already established law, the greater good of the nation should be cast aside to advocate whatever wild eyed idea's the empowered class of that state wishes. People should be afriad not just on the principle that Roe v. Wade can be overturned, but the blatant way this state went about it, ANY constitutionally set right and freedom can be challenged and potentially revoked by 'rogue states' such as SD.

A few years ago, Alabama voters voted to officially remove miscentigation laws from their books. The laws were not enforced, but remained within the state codes for 'sentimental reasoning'. 40% of Alabamans voted against this, however. Imagine if the state were to enact another review of the code, and decided to challenge the supreme court ruling stating such laws were illegal and violated equal protection (VA v Loving)? Imagine Brown v Board of education being overturned in a state like Texas or South Carolina, in which school segregation is still problematic and persistent (also which have a substantial population which supports school segregation). Imagine your right to counsel was revoked, or your very right to vote taken away (The Voting Rights act is up for review soon, do you trust the Republicans in power will 'do the right thing' and maintain it, or do the thing which politically benefits them and restrict or outright allow it to die?).

SD is waging war on American freedom in a manner in which Bin Laden could only dream. NOW is the time to stand up and and contribute to the cause of protecting the Freedom which makes our nation great. Not just for our sakes, for our childrens sakes.

The Truth about Sean Hannity

I dont need to say much to most Americans concerning this guys extreme right wing, racist southerner viewpoints, but many will be shicked to know if his close and personal relationship with reknown white supremacist Hal Turner...to the point of agreeing with his blatant hate, and even supporting his viewpoints of mass genocide towards blacks, jews and hispanics. Here is the confirming article from the nation

The Link

The Article-

Hannity's Soul-Mate of Hate
by Max Blumenthal


This year a man named Hal Turner sat before his computer at his suburban home in North Bergen, New Jersey, posting bomb-making tips on his website, hailing the firebombing of an apartment containing "Savage Negroes" and calling for the murder of immigrants. "When enough illegal aliens get killed they will stop coming to the country!" Turner wrote.

Turner was once a prominent activist in New Jersey's Republican Party. To area conservatives, he was best known by his moniker for call-ins to the Sean Hannity Show, "Hal from North Bergen." For years, Hannity offered his top-rated radio show as a regular forum for Turner's occasionally racist, always over-the-top rants. Hannity also chatted with him off-air, allegedly offering encouragement to Turner as he struggled to overcome a cocaine habit and homosexual leanings. Turner has boasted that Hannity once invited Turner and his son on to the set of Fox News's Hannity and Colmes. Today, Turner lurks on the fringes of the far right, spouting hate-laced tirades on his webcast radio show. Hannity, meanwhile, remains mum about his former alliance with the neo-Nazi, homing in instead on the supposed racism of black and Latino Democrats.

A former moving company manager and real estate agent, Turner cut his teeth as the Northern New Jersey coordinator for Pat Buchanan's quixotic 1992 presidential campaign. He was an aggressive self-promoter who found a platform for his views on the radio show of Bob Grant, which was broadcast by ABC's flagship station, New York City's WABC. Grant was a pioneer of right-wing radio and, incidentally, a hysterical racist. In March 1995, according to the media watchdog FAIR, Grant entertained the call of a promoter for the neo-Nazi group National Alliance who billed his mission as the "support of European males." "I don't have a problem with the National Alliance!" Grant twice declared. Less than one month later, the Oklahoma City Federal Building was blown up by a white supremacist who said he was influenced by the plot of National Alliance founder William Pierce's pulp novel, The Turner Diaries. Grant insisted on his show for days afterward that Arabs were responsible for the !
bombing.

WABC came under enormous pressure from the NAACP and other civil rights groups to dump Grant. He had called Haitian refugees "subhuman infiltrators"; remarked that the United States contained "millions of subhumanoids, savages who really would feel more at home careening along the sands of the Kalahari or the dry deserts of eastern Kenya"; and often promoted "The Bob Grant Mandatory Sterilization Program" for minorities. In 1994, after a group of African-American clergy members issued a plea for sponsors to boycott Grant's show, Turner, at the time a frequent voice as a caller on Grant's show, organized a pro-Grant rally in Trenton, which was attended by numerous members of the white supremacist Nationalist Movement. Two years later, WABC finally gave Grant the boot.

WABC tapped Sean Hannity to fill Grant's seat in the broadcast booth. For Hannity, who had spent his career in the wilderness of the right-wing radio circuit, the gig was like a dream. "I'd grown up listening to Bob Grant...one of the most entertaining hosts I'd ever heard," Hannity wrote in his 2002 book, Let Freedom Ring: Winning the War of Liberty Over Liberalism. Hannity started out as a broadcaster at the liberal University of Santa Barbara. "But it didn't last long.... The left-wing management had a zero-tolerance policy for conservative points of view. And I was promptly fired," Hannity wrote. "They didn't like the comments one guest made on the show," he added, without specifying what those comments were. From there, Hannity was hired by the right-wing WVNN in Huntsville, Alabama, and then by WGST in Atlanta, where he filled in for his friend, the "libertarian" broadcaster Neil Boortz. By the time WABC brought him on board, he was already co-hosting Fox News's newly!
minted Hannity and Colmes, which, as of May, was America's second-rated cable news show, with 1.3 million households viewing each night.

On WABC Hannity inherited Grant's fan base of angry white males, who listened to his show in the New York City area. Hannity recognized his audience's thirst for red meat, racist rhetoric. However, he knew that if he wanted to avoid Grant's fate, he needed an air of deniability. When "Hal from North Bergen" began calling his show, Hannity found he could avoid the dangers of direct race-baiting by simply outsourcing it to Turner.

During an August 1998 episode of the show, Turner reminded Hannity that were it not for the graciousness of the white man, "black people would still be swinging on trees in Africa," according to Daryle Jenkins, co-founder of the New Jersey-based antiracism group One People's Project. Instead of rebuking Turner or cutting him off, Hannity continued to welcome his calls. On December 10 of the following year, Turner called Hannity's show to announce his campaign to run for a seat in the US House of Representatives from New Jersey, and to attack his presumptive opponent, Democratic Representative Robert Menendez, as a "left-wing nut."

By this time, according to Jenkins, Turner and Hannity had bonded off-air. In 1998 Hannity received an anonymous e-mail linking to an AOL discussion board on which Turner had allegedly confessed to a cocaine problem and alluded to past homosexual trysts. Turner (or someone claiming to be Turner) wrote in an August 4, 1998, Google discussion forum that Hannity called him to clear the air: "Just last week, Sean phoned me at home from his job at FOX News to continue a conversation we'd begun earlier while he was at WABC," Turner wrote. "Sean advised that one of you sensitive souls sent him an e-mail about 'revelations I had made' here on the internet. He told me it was obviously and [sic] attempt to 'poison the water.' " Turner continued, "I told him that I've done things I'm not proud of, and had dark times in my life; and those experiences helped shape the way I live today...the right way. He [Hannity] laughed and commented that he knew the feeling." Turner added that such c!
hats with Hannity were "not unusual," often occurring while Hannity held his calls during commercial breaks.

Jenkins told me that while he and a group of antiracism activists demonstrated against a July 17, 2003, National Alliance meeting in Elmwood Park, New Jersey, which Turner attended, he encountered Turner and asked him about his relationship with Hannity. Turner claimed that he and Hannity would talk by phone and even recounted that Hannity had once invited him and his son on to the set of Hannity and Colmes. "In my view," says Jenkins, "I think Hannity has helped Turner out quite a bit. I'm willing to bet most of the conversations they had consisted of them talking shop."

But Turner and Hannity's relationship collapsed in 2000 after the Hudson County Republican Party endorsed Turner's primary challenger, Theresa De Leon, an accomplished businesswoman and dark-skinned Latina. "I had never judged people on their race, not prior to that point," Turner recalled in a February 23, 2003, article in the Bergen County Record. "And there I was, on the receiving end--in America--of a decision that I wasn't good enough because I was a white male." Turner finished last in the primary, just as Hannity was hitting his stride as a major Fox News personality. When WABC's screeners began blocking Turner's calls, he realized he was no longer of use to Hannity.

So Turner took matters into his own hands, purchasing a time slot on the eclectic shortwave radio station WBCQ. For more than four years, Turner unleashed a barrage of hate speech at his perceived enemies--"bull-dyke lesbians," "savage Negro beasts," "filthy mongrels," etc. In 2003 Turner said US District Judge Joan Humphrey Lefkow was "worthy of being killed" for ruling against white supremacist leader Matthew Hale in a trademark dispute. The day after Lefkow's husband and mother were found murdered on February 28, Turner penned an article for the far-right chat room Liberty Forum outlining tips to help white supremacists avoid scrutiny from federal agents. "So what can we, as White Nationalists (WN), expect as a result [of the killings]?" Turner wrote. "Frankly, a SHIT STORM!" Turner was eventually visited by FBI agents, though when a suspect was arrested, he had no organizational links to white supremacist groups. By this time, Turner had quit the Jewish-owned WBCQ becaus!
e, as he told the Associated Press, he saw Mel Gibson's The Passion of the Christ and realized he "could no longer do business with Jews."

Today, as one of America's most recognizable broadcast personalities, Hannity vehemently denounces racism as he sees it. During the 2000 presidential campaign, Hannity demanded time and again that Al Gore fire his black campaign manager, Donna Brazile, for her comment that "we're not gonna let the white boys win." Two years later, during California's gubernatorial recall election, Hannity repeatedly attacked Democratic candidate and Lieutenant Governor Cruz Bustamante as a racist for refusing to renounce his association thirty years prior with the Chicano student group MECHA. Yet Hannity is silent about the racist affiliations of favored guests like Family Research Council president Tony Perkins, Mississippi Republican Governor Haley Barbour and former Republican Congressman Bob Barr, all of whom have spoken before gatherings of America's largest white supremacist group, the Council of Conservative Citizens.

Hannity remains silent, too, about his relationship with his former friend, the neo-Nazi Hal Turner. Whatever he thinks about Turner's politics today, Hannity views his career as a uniquely glorious phenomenon--right-wing hate radio as the American Dream. "This is America, after all," Hannity wrote in Let Freedom Ring. "Whatever you think, you're free to say it out loud--as long as you're prepared to defend it. And if you get lucky...someday you might even get paid for it.

Futhermore, here is an article on Hal Turner from wikipedia-

Turner is an independent media personality and occasional candidate in various state elections. He describes himself as being a Christian Identityadherent. Before launching his own talk show, Turner was a regular caller (known simply as "Hal Sharpton from North Bergen") to conservative Sean Hannity's and Bob Grant's talk shows onWABC radio in New York City. Though his comments on those men's shows were highly provocative and possibly calculated in their offensiveness, they were rarely outright racist.

In 2000, Turner sought the local Republican nomination for election in his local congressional district but lost to DemocratRobert Menendez and six other candidates (including another Republican, Theresa de Leon). Afterward, Turner had a reported "e[iphany"" deciding the political system was rigged against white men (de Leon is hispanic) and abandoning all ties to the mainstream.

That same year, he started "The Hal Turner Show" by renting time onWBCQ and the "Turner Radio Network" to distribute programming by other white nationalists via Sattelite.

Lets all do our part to keep these bigots and dangerous extremists like this from doing more recruiting for their white supremacist cause!

Progressives, Populist, Constitutionalist, Libertarians, Greens, Prolifers...its time to act!

Progressives, Populist, Constitutionalist, Libertarians, Greens, Prolifers...its time to get up and act!

I suppose I should lay the groundwork for what this blog is exactly. This blog is not a 'personal journal' blog. Its a news blog. And by 'News', I dont mean "make it up myself" news. This blog exist as a hub for all relevant information on crooked misdealings of our current elitist nonchalaunt democrats, supremacist underhanded crooked republicans, extremist media outlets pretending to be 'fair and balanced', and other outlets the public is fed as 'mainstream'.

Now, weve all seen Fight Club. We all know the Tyler Durden speech where he lays out how this generation has been brought up to think we're all going to be rich or famous, or comfortable with the possbility of a nice job, and good family, a pretty house in a nice welcoming neighborhood, and how we're all finding out just how bleak our real futures are, so I wont repeat it (I guess I just did). But what we all need to know here and now is that our collective countries, be they America, Canada, UK or otherwise, are under assault. The basic human freedoms we all valueand all expect, freedom of control over our bodies and the choices we make over it, freedom of expression, freedom of expression, freedom to criticize our governments action, freedom to have our votes count, freedom to be treated as a human being regardless of income or social status, freedom of religious choice, freedom to have our religion or culture be respected and not mocked by the hypocrits who cry foul when their religions ethics are questioned, freedom to be judged by our character and actions, not the color of our skin, these freedoms are under assault. The men assaulting it are not very unlike the last major group to do so, in the late 1930's and early 1940's. The only difference is they have learned their lessons in subterfuge.
The enter the doors of our society (which we leave open, as it should be, to ensure that all decent human beings are allowed a fair chance) quietly, and twist the laws against their meanings. They flood our neighborhoods with hate fliers, they organize at our universities in order to change the teachings of tolerance, and all under the basis that their 'intolerances' qualifies them as a protected group, and that we should embrace and allow their intolerance attitudes in the name of 'being tolerant'. I say to you all, you know this is not right, you feel the same anger and disgust that myself and and us all. WE are the majority, despite what their skewed marketing polls. Those polls exist solely to convince the masses that the majority is actually a minority. Our enemies, the intolerant, the hateful, the ignorant, have recruited (sometimes among those whom they despise, in order to further their causes under mask of acceptance), they have saved up (as our missing 'tax breaks' indicate), and they have gathered. They have got their shit together people, and unless something is done NOW, They will turn the free world into a hell on earth the likes of which the third reich could only have dreamed of.

This is not the first site to have such viewpoints. The web is filled with them. What I intend to create here is database of news articles. The purpose of these articles will be to point out key figures in this extremist take over, and reveal all the things about them that they wish to keep secret.
Granted, none of this will surprise many of you, but with any hope, SOME of this will inform you, even if its in the slightest way. Furthermore, if it ever reaches that point, this site (and the message board I will set up for itt) may be a place for other posters to identify websites, news stations (local, national, internet), universities, high schools, local/state governments and webforums which are gathering spots for HATE, and HYPOCRISY. Perhaps, with any at al luck, we will be able to use this site, or some future subsequent site, as a gathering and organizational spot for counter-extremism and counter-elitism activities.